Mandatory Audit Partner Rotation: Perceptions of Audit Quality Consequences

Does Mandatory Rotation of Audit Partners Improve Audit Quality?

Opponents of mandatory rotation argue that a change of partner is bad for audit quality, as it results in a loss of client-specific knowledge. On the other hand, proponents argue that a change of partner is beneficial, as it results in a positive peer review effect and a fresh perspective on the audit. We test the impact of mandatory partner rotation on audit quality using a unique dataset of a...

The Impact of Dual Role of Forensic Accountant-Audit Firm's Partner on Audit Quality

Many data are effective in audit quality that are not part of the audit requirements. One of them is the personal characteristics of the auditor, such as skills and expertise. Forensic accountants have the skills need to spend on specialized fraud courses that they lack a formal non- forensic accountant. To investigate the Impact of dual role of forensic accountant- Official Accountant and audi...

investigating the impact of mandatory audit firm rotation on audit fee and audit market competition

this study aims at investigating the impacts of mandatory audit firm rotation (mafr) on audit fees and audit market compeition among firms listed on tehran stock exchange (tse). since 2007 firms listed on tse are not allowed to use services of any single audit firm for more than 4 consecutive years. we tested our hypotheses using multivariate regression analysis and mean comparison test. our sa...

The drivers of audit quality: auditors’ perceptions

Non-audit fees, disclosure and audit quality

This paper investigates the effect of non-audit services on audit quality. Following the announcement of the requirement to disclose non-audit fees, approximately one-third of UK quoted companies disclosed before the requirement became effective. Whilst distressed companies were more likely to disclose early, auditor size, directors’ shareholdings and non-audit fees were not signiŽ cantly corre...